Wednesday, March 18, 2009
-
2009.03.18 16:05:
@jdhunt re "dim" http://tinyurl.com/d3omp3 and http://tinyurl.com/ckx47f and especially http://tinyurl.com/ctbluj
-
2009.03.18 16:10:
@jdhunt and wait until you see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redim. but there have been worse declaration schemes.
-
2009.03.18 18:12:
should the olpc xo have had a basic interpeter instead of linux, then? : http://tinyurl.com/8alwkd.
-
2009.03.18 18:17:
10 input "repeat: " s$
20 print s$
30 goto 20
-
2009.03.18 18:41:
RT @klaatu RT @digitalcaffeine re ...tachyons ... http://tinyurl.com/ckvzzn : == no 'time' - this is what i've been trying to say (sort of)
-
2009.03.18 18:42:
hmm, recursive RT etiquette: rt the original ? all ? do not abridge the quote ? => any commentary would only follow
-
2009.03.18 18:47:
if 'black holes' are really 'frozen stars', similar reasoning would imply that any 'big bang' was also in a (nearly?) timeless state
-
2009.03.18 18:50:
all 'dimensionality' as emergent from differing 'energy states' of - what ?
-
2009.03.18 18:53:
all those 'whats' are effectively organized into 'universes' in terms of whatever local consistency is in operation
-
2009.03.18 18:55:
'consistency': if there's strong & weak anthropic principals, consider this one "feeble"
-
2009.03.18 19:12:
note: 'whats' are of all possible types, ie, all microstates of all possible 'property' combinations exist
-
2009.03.18 19:15:
'property': absolute mesaure of relativeness (huh?)
-
2009.03.18 19:16:
fundamental fact of reality: distinguishability.
-
2009.03.18 19:18:
i there a "gibber" service ? becasue this sure isn't twitterish...
-
2009.03.18 19:22:
anyway, the basic program there is to take the concept of multiversality and push it into the smallest scales, rather than the largest
-
2009.03.18 19:28:
on the large scale, then, it's not "all possible universes", but "all possible _consistent_ universes"
-
2009.03.18 19:29:
the _nonconsistent_ ones - that's where mysticism lives
-
2009.03.18 19:32:
completeness: in the limit of ever-added axioms (a la godel), does that approach covering 'consistency' - or is there a gap ?
-
2009.03.18 19:33:
ie - is there a non-rational reality ?
-
2009.03.18 19:58:
when are we getting "reputation" in twitter ?
-
2009.03.18 19:59:
@jdhunt 10 print "*slap* conform!" 20 goto 10
-
2009.03.18 20:03:
test test... (for my aggregator)
-
2009.03.18 20:06:
bi-cameral twitter: "there's all these voices in my head!"
-
2009.03.19 00:32:
what i want is the ability to subscribe to thw updates of others' followers / followings.
-
2009.03.19 00:33:
with that sort of indirection and chaining, would be far more interesting. i don't want to manage all this myself.
-
2009.03.19 00:34:
likewie withrss - i've wanted the ability to subscribe to others' opml.
-
2009.03.19 00:35:
ttytter drwaback: on xo, can't seem to get readline feature to work, makes proofing typos impractical
-
2009.03.19 00:38:
let's see - chained meta-subscriptions - then weught by number of times a particular subsription occurs in the total chain. add other
-
2009.03.19 00:42:
ttytter & readline: tried tty1, xo terminal, xfce terminal - nope. and both system rl & perl rl seem to be in place
-
2009.03.19 00:46:
yep, twit needs scores & reputations on several scales for users / individual updates. /. -ish ?
-
2009.03.19 00:51:
[score -2, personal trivia] btw, if i'm using ttyter, i'm sitting in front of the tv with the xo