fractalnavel

how do i explain this ?   this is exactly the same flag as when bush, with 51% of the vote, claimed a “mandate”, and liberals were reported as throwing in the towel, and shifting their own attitudes farther left right (i meant right, dammit! crap. - 2005.05.01) while bowing to the “inevitable” victory of conservatives: 

• mandate ?  no, hardly.
• was the report on liberal attitudes accurate, or was it conservative propaganda ?
• is there any reason for liberals to throw in the towel ?  no.
• should they ?  no.  the result would be a severe imbalance in in many parts of society, global and national.

as for religious conservatism, i am all for maintaining their traditions.  but that is no signal to the rest of society (even if these interpretations of events were tenable, which they aren't).  i do, however, recognize that many will treat it as such, regardless of the illogic involved.  thus, the flag.

besides, as i've described before, religious conservatism and the republican/political conservative agendas are not identical; in fact, they differ widely.  but the confusion of these is widespread. 

and the suckers - liberals and religious both - buy this message, unable to distinguish the two and buying into the political fallacies.  this is the same tragic mistake that has ravaged history until recent times. 

to be balanced, i should defend the political conservatives as well.  but their agenda seems very much to be “shove our beliefs down everyone's throats”.  since when is that defensible ?  this species of “conservatism” is in reality tyranny. respectable conservatives should be outraged (that's why i try and isolate the abusive group under the label “neocon”, so as not to sully the others). whatever happened to freedoms ?  that isn't liberalism, libertarianism, or even conservatism - it's americanism.  and more than that, it's democracy.

hopefully, leveler heads will prevail.

SNOW !!

AH-ha-hahahahahaa !